February 01, 2004
Everyday urbanism at night
(addendum to this post)
It occurs to me that everyday urbanism might imply something else for planners. I'm a bit less clear on this, because it's essentially been something I've believed in for awhile, so I might just be seeing agreement everywhere.
If everyday urbanism is interested in clashing ideas communicated through streetscapes and buildings, and is trying to escape streetscapes that speak in a single voice, then we ought to stop doing large-scale developments, and should focus on having people build piecemeal, a building or block or two at a time.
Practically, this means, I think, getting rid of the current PUD-crutch and completely revamping zoning ordinances to allow for flexibility, density and mixing of uses.
« the reality you didn't hear | Main | Economies don't eat »

About
weblog homeFAQ
contact
tol.com
archives
rss feed

Daily Links
Mark Sanford - A Conservative Conservationist? - washingtonpost.com
In Energy Conservation, Calif. Sees Light - washingtonpost.com
Reaping a profit from the air
Chicago Climate Exchange
In Niger, Trees and Crops Turn Back the Desert - New York Times
Fire Danger Fuels Trees-For-Fuel Plans - washingtonpost.com
MacArthur business group forms
'Sweet and Low: A Family Story,' by Rich Cohen - The New York Times Book Revi...
Plans for new park unveiled
Possible inclusion of a windmill?
Wind Power Becoming Cheaper Than Conventional Power
In Austin, TX, and Colorado
Microentrepreneurializing water and electricity
Dean Kamen's next big invention
Climate change impacts Indian food supply
America's most distrusted minority
Better by design
Using natural design solutions
Dairy Report and Scorecard
Organic dairy assessments

Links
snarkout
the hungry tiger
randomWalks
izzle pfaff!
growlers
laura
crooked timber
three-toed sloth
beyond brilliance, beyond stupidity